Explanation: As discussed above, it follows that 'All huts are temples'. I is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds. II is the converse of the second premise and so it also holds.
Statements: All huts are mansions. All mansions are temples. Conclusions: I. Some temples are huts. II.Some temples are mansions.
Review the verified answer and explanation for this DemoPaper-Pakistan past-paper question on CampusFin.
Question context
This question is part of 🧩 Logical Reasoning within the broader 🧠 Aptitude Mastery subject and appears in the DemoPaper-Pakistan preparation collection. Reviewing the answer together with nearby questions helps reinforce the underlying concept and identify how it may appear in competitive exams.