Explanation: Since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'All pens are houses'. II is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds. Since the term 'houses' is distributed in I without being distributed in any of the premises, so I does not follow.
Statements: All pens are roads. All roads are houses. Conclusions: I. All houses are pens. II. Some houses are pens.
Review the verified answer and explanation for this DemoPaper-Pakistan past-paper question on CampusFin.
Question context
This question is part of 🧩 Logical Reasoning within the broader 🧠 Aptitude Mastery subject and appears in the DemoPaper-Pakistan preparation collection. Reviewing the answer together with nearby questions helps reinforce the underlying concept and identify how it may appear in competitive exams.